Fur is an artistic
movie about an artist. Diane Arbus was a 20th century photographer greatly
acclaimed for her front running work with dark and mysterious undertones.
This film tries to pay homage to her not by presenting a straight forward
biography but rather use an artistic approach using a fictional tale to
sort of represent her life. If you are a fan of true human drama then
this might turn you off right away. I thought this could still work on
some level if there was enough depth present. While the movie does present
Diane as a bit complex, her character is not fleshed out well enough for
the viewer to get some sort of understanding of the woman behind the camera.
The plot is fairly simple and therefore only a few notions of who Diane
was are presented.
The acting in this
film is good even though the actors don't really have too much to go on.
Nicole Kidman does a great job in her role; the problem is her role has
so little to offer. Her character is the main focus of this movie where
a simple story does not do much for development. The basic premise of
the film is the relationship Diane builds with Lionel, her neighbor who
happens to be a bit of a freak. It is evident that she is somewhat disconnected
from everyday life and she is drawn to things that are different and weird.
That's about it. While her parents, husband, and daughters are interjected
in the story, her relationship with them is not really explored enough.
A bizarre love triangle emerges and where that leaves Diane and her husband
is not really clear. While the plot is a bit disappointing the good acting
does help hold the movie together.
Since the story here
is simple it manages to move along rather well throughout the film. The
plot flows well and will not make the viewer impatient at any time. The
setting of early 20th century New York is also presented well. This film
had a great deal of potential but perhaps the screen writer's approach
to simplify the main character is the movie's downfall. If you don't know
much about Diane Arbus before seeing this film you will know just as much
after seeing it. While this is a mayor disappointment, the film remains
a decent viewing experience because of other factors. If approached as
purely a work of fiction this movie can be enjoyed on some level even
if the plot is pretty simple.
If you want to see
a biography or learn more about the artist then I would definitely not
recommend this movie. It will truly disappoint on that level. If you want
to see something a bit different yet not too complicated then it may be
worth your time. I did enjoy the performances of Ty Burrell and Nicole
Kidman even though their characters were limited. This movie is not bad
but there is nothing special here, it is a straight forward tale that
resembles many other movies. The fact that one of the main characters
is a bit of a freak might be different but even that is not too interesting
in this movie. Toss this in the "average movie" pile and be
done with it.
|